Skip to main content
ADMISSIONS/ROLLING
JOIN THE STUDENT DISCORD
CASE STUDY · YRI FELLOW

Discovered the Jitter Paradox in physics-informed AI, accepted at an IEEE conference

Physics-informed neural networks learn solutions that obey physical laws, and newer architectures called Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks often solve equations more accurately. Nishanth asked a sharper question: are those solutions good enough to rediscover the underlying equation? Comparing both architectures on the heat equation under noise, he found a Jitter Paradox. The more accurate networks produced rougher derivatives that corrupted symbolic equation discovery, while simpler networks recovered the physics more reliably. He also proposed a new metric, the Bias Inheritance Ratio, to measure how model errors leak into discovered equations.

FIELDScientific Machine Learning
RESULTFirst-author paper accepted at an IEEE conference
VENUEIEEE, 2026
BEFORE THE FELLOWSHIP

An 11th grader at Delhi Public School Bangalore North who taught himself real analysis and university mathematics because his school did not offer them.

AFTER

First author of a study that named and quantified the Jitter Paradox in physics-informed neural networks, accepted at an IEEE conference with minor revisions.

THE LEDGER
01First-author paper accepted at an IEEE conference
02Identified and named the Jitter Paradox
03Proposed the Bias Inheritance Ratio, a new evaluation metric
04Combined PINNs with SINDy and symbolic regression for equation discovery
05Accepted with minor revisions
NEXT CASE STUDYRaaghav Sai Gundabolu, First-author paper accepted at an IEEE conference

Every case study starts with one application.

ROLLING ADMISSIONS · SEATS LIMITED · NOW REVIEWING